• Bard College
  • Psychology Program
  • IRB
  • Internal

Memory Dynamics Lab

Justin C. Hulbert, Principal Investigator

  • People
    • Principal investigator
    • Lab management
    • Senior project students
    • Research assistants
    • Alumni/Alumnae
  • Research
    • Overview
    • Publications
  • Courses
    • Intro to psychological science (PSY141)
    • Learning & memory (PSY 234)
    • Advanced methodology (PSY COG): Memory Dynamics Lab
    • Sleep! seminar (PSY 353)
    • The medial temporal lobe memory system (PSY 330)
    • Cognitive psychology (PSY 230)
    • Design & analysis I (PSY 201)
    • Research methods in psychology (PSY 204)
    • Neuroscience (PSY 231)
    • Mind, Brain, & Behavior seminar (MBB317)
    • Science of forgetting (PSY 335)
  • Get Involved!
    • Participate
    • Research experience
    • Get in touch
You are here: Home / Research / Publications / Evidence against associative blocking as a cause of cue-independent retrieval-induced forgetting

Evidence against associative blocking as a cause of cue-independent retrieval-induced forgetting

Evidence against associative blocking as a cause of cue-independent retrieval-induced forgetting. Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 11-21.

Abstract: Selectively retrieving an item from long-term memory reduces the accessibility of competing traces, a phenomenon known as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). RIF exhibits cue independence, or the tendency for forgetting to generalize to novel test cues, suggesting an inhibitory basis for this phenomenon. An alternative view (Camp, Pecher, & Schmidt, 2007; Camp et al., 2009; Perfect et al., 2004) suggests that using novel test cues to measure cue independence actually engenders associative interference when participants covertly supplement retrieval with practiced cues that then associatively block retrieval. Accordingly, the covert-cueing hypothesis assumes that the relative strength of the practiced items at final test – and not the inhibition levied on the unpracticed items during retrieval practice – underlies cue-independent forgetting. As such, this perspective predicts that strengthening practiced items by any means, even if not via retrieval practice, should induce forgetting. Contrary to these predictions, however, we present clear evidence that cue-independent forgetting is induced by retrieval practice and not by repeated study exposures. This dissociation occurred despite significant, comparable levels of strengthening of practiced items in each case, and despite the use of Anderson and Spellman’s original (1995) independent probe method criticized by covert-cueing theorists as being especially conducive to associative blocking. These results demonstrate that cue-independent RIF is unrelated to the strengthening of practiced items, and thereby fail to support a key prediction of the covert-cueing hypothesis. The results, instead, favor a role of inhibition in resolving retrieval interference. »PDF

A Place to Think

Lab Mission

The Memory Dynamics Lab, part of the Psychology Program at Bard College, works to harness the mechanisms responsible for adaptively retrieving, consolidating, and forgetting memories through cognitive neuroscience (including the study of human brainwaves and behavior while awake and asleep). In doing so, we aim to distill and disseminate strategies designed to help learners capitalize on these mental operations, allowing them to better remember when/what they want to remember and forget when/what they want to forget.

Memory Dynamics Lab

Mailing Address

Justin Hulbert, Ph.D.
Bard College
PO Box 5000
Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000

Contact Us

(p): 845.752.4390
(e): [email protected]

Related Links

»CompMem Lab
»Memory Control Lab
»Context Lab
»BAP Lab

  • People
  • Research
  • Courses
  • Get Involved!

Copyright © 2025 · Education Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in